![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png){kind=small}
threemonkeysI talked to a telemarketer today and actually accepted their offer to come around to quote. *pauses while ![[livejournal.com profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/external/lj-userinfo.gif)
gillpolack recovers from shock*
There was a reason. She got the name of the company out in the first few words and I realised that it was somebody that I have been planning to talk to anyway - I had got as far as finding their street address to call on them. That gave me pause and so while I was gathering the mental resources to say "I was interested until you invaded my home with your call" she continued with the spiel. She screwed it up - making mistakes and stumbling over her words and cheerfully apologising. So I felt a bit of sympathy for her and because I was interested in the product anyway I continued the conversation.
But I am suspicious. Is this a new tactic? By being incompetent was she making a deliberate attempt to gain my sympathy and so give her a hearing? Has anybody noticed this - is cheery muddling replacing "how are you today sir"?
gillpolack recovers from shock*There was a reason. She got the name of the company out in the first few words and I realised that it was somebody that I have been planning to talk to anyway - I had got as far as finding their street address to call on them. That gave me pause and so while I was gathering the mental resources to say "I was interested until you invaded my home with your call" she continued with the spiel. She screwed it up - making mistakes and stumbling over her words and cheerfully apologising. So I felt a bit of sympathy for her and because I was interested in the product anyway I continued the conversation.
But I am suspicious. Is this a new tactic? By being incompetent was she making a deliberate attempt to gain my sympathy and so give her a hearing? Has anybody noticed this - is cheery muddling replacing "how are you today sir"?