Writing the anti-genre
Oct. 1st, 2008 05:50 pmSometimes when you are struggling with a book, you have an "ah ha" moment that turns it around for you. I thought I had such a moment when reading Richard Morgan's fantasy The Steel Remains. I'd been struggling with what looked like an attempt to bust the genre - doing stuff that was "original" in an attempt to create a point of difference. When you try too hard to do something like that, it seldom works - you just have to tell your story in your voice and if difference arises then its all good. Except that what Morgan was doing didn't seem all that original either. Then I had the "ah ha" moment and realised that he was trying to write a Michael Moorcock story. It all fit together and I was able to see what was Moorcock and what was I assumed Morgan's own voice. It made the book so much easier to take. Not that much more enjoyable though - see I have to confess to not being all that big a Moorcock fan. I have been a Morgan fan though - overall it averages out to being readable but not startlingly good.
But getting the influence did make me happy. Well until I read the afterword in the acknowledgements basically said that the influences should have been very obvious. That plus the fact that three influences were cited and I'd only got one of them - perhaps the fact that I hadn't read the others at all is consolation. Lets hope that Morgan goes back to writing with just his own voice.
But getting the influence did make me happy. Well until I read the afterword in the acknowledgements basically said that the influences should have been very obvious. That plus the fact that three influences were cited and I'd only got one of them - perhaps the fact that I hadn't read the others at all is consolation. Lets hope that Morgan goes back to writing with just his own voice.
no subject
Date: 2008-10-01 11:08 am (UTC)If you liked Altered Carbon then you may like David Gunn's 'Death's Head' books. I've recently had the first two to review and they were fantastic, violent and unrelentingly fast paced. Books for people who though Takeshi Kovacs was a bit too easy going.
no subject
Date: 2008-10-01 07:08 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-10-01 07:22 pm (UTC)Its an old trick putting SF hints into fantasy books to tickle the interest of sf readers - these days I only get interested if the author actually carries through with them.
no subject
Date: 2008-10-01 07:26 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-10-01 07:36 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-10-01 07:45 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-10-01 07:55 pm (UTC)Gosh what a long parentheses. Where was I? Oh yes -- the biggest influence I spotted in Morgan's book was Roger Zelazny. The situation reminded me very much of "Lord Of Light", particularly the dialogue with the so-called Gods. I won't be at all surprised to find, in a later sequel, that these gods are stranded astronauts, or perhaps lunar colonists. And it's quite obvious that they are the survivors of some kind of war that destroyed the moon.
Morgan presents his novel as a fantasy but I don't believe it for a moment. There are so many hints that this is taking place in the far future, following several alien invasions. Human science has degenerated, humanity is struggling and much history has been lost. It's a very Zelazny situation told, often, in very Zelazny language.
I think it's Morgan's best book and I'm looking forward to the sequels.
no subject
Date: 2008-10-01 08:05 pm (UTC)As I noted to Simon, its an old trick making SF hints in a fantasy in order to string sf oriented readers along to see what the technology might be, but I'm not prepared to read a sequel (or sequels) just to find out.
no subject
Date: 2008-10-01 09:02 pm (UTC)