No B just zzzz
Dec. 31st, 2008 10:08 amI hated Lord of the Flies. I hated it in the way that you can only hate a book you are forced to read and deconstruct in high school english class. Up until that time I'd rather liked the old castaway tales. I knew that the noble attempts to survive on desert islands were totally unrealistic but I loved them anyway. I loved their SF equivalents too. Golding and my English teachers took that away from me.
Move forward to today and Terry Pratchett's Nation. It reads like those old Victorian era castaway books I read as a kid. To be more clear - it reads like a kids book. Aimed I'd guess as the 10-12 year old bracket. Except it doesn't say that anywhere on the book. Read the cover notes and you would be thinking that you are going to read some sort of satire - a Lord of the Flies type allegory in fact. Oh sure there is an allegorical element to it, but it is pretty obvious stuff. Most allegories have extra deeper layers - this book has extra surface layers.
I can't help thinking that some marketing person at Doubleday (an English lit major probably) has looked at this book and groaned about receiving another kids book instead of an adult diskworld novel which would be easier to sell. So armed with the knowledge that most Pratchett kids books sell to adults anyway has left out the critical age specific information and tried to sell it as something smarter than it is. A pity really because as a kids book it works fairly well - I can see it as working when read aloud to a 10 year old. It even as a few old style Pratchett jokes to keep the adult reader amused - just not many.
So if you have this book, read it to your children. And never ever force them to study Lord of the Flies.
EDIT - That's SIR Terry Pratchett - seriously!
Move forward to today and Terry Pratchett's Nation. It reads like those old Victorian era castaway books I read as a kid. To be more clear - it reads like a kids book. Aimed I'd guess as the 10-12 year old bracket. Except it doesn't say that anywhere on the book. Read the cover notes and you would be thinking that you are going to read some sort of satire - a Lord of the Flies type allegory in fact. Oh sure there is an allegorical element to it, but it is pretty obvious stuff. Most allegories have extra deeper layers - this book has extra surface layers.
I can't help thinking that some marketing person at Doubleday (an English lit major probably) has looked at this book and groaned about receiving another kids book instead of an adult diskworld novel which would be easier to sell. So armed with the knowledge that most Pratchett kids books sell to adults anyway has left out the critical age specific information and tried to sell it as something smarter than it is. A pity really because as a kids book it works fairly well - I can see it as working when read aloud to a 10 year old. It even as a few old style Pratchett jokes to keep the adult reader amused - just not many.
So if you have this book, read it to your children. And never ever force them to study Lord of the Flies.
EDIT - That's SIR Terry Pratchett - seriously!
no subject
Date: 2008-12-30 10:36 pm (UTC)I have heard no good reviews of Nation now... :/
no subject
Date: 2008-12-30 10:45 pm (UTC)If you read Nation as one of Pratchett's kids books it is perfectly acceptable. As with LotF, its all about the way you go into it.
no subject
Date: 2008-12-30 11:58 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-12-31 12:08 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-12-31 12:21 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-12-31 12:25 am (UTC)Sorry, this is more of a waffle than an answer. I haven't had anybody to talk to intelligently since Xmas Eve.
no subject
Date: 2008-12-31 12:48 am (UTC)I remember late in my last year that the got a real shock when she realised that the class were not getting into Auden - her favourite poet.
no subject
Date: 2008-12-31 12:54 am (UTC)Read Catcher in the Rye two years ago (after holding a copy captive for around ten years). As an adult I could see what the fuss was about. If I read it as a teenager I would have got the wrong signals: i.e. it's okay to be a self-obsessed pratt; under age drinking, especially of spirits, is very cool; anger and bewilderment are the marks of sophistication. Depression in the face of the death/suicide of an elder brother would have been lost on me.
Still have difficulty with poetry. Helps that most of it is pretentious crap. Hearing it read to drunk varsity students by touring poets took some of the baggage away - but nowhere near enough.
no subject
Date: 2008-12-31 12:58 am (UTC)I don't think I came out of high school English with any set books that I admired. All the books I liked were ones I found myself - even a couple on the possible set books list not actually taught.
I did pick up an appreciation of Shakespeare though. I guess everybody did a few of his plays at school too.
no subject
Date: 2008-12-31 01:00 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-12-31 01:03 am (UTC)I read Lord of the Flies voluntarily in my high school years, and was favourably impressed. The only sf my high school English classes managed to ruin temporarily was The Chrysalids, which I later rediscovered, enjoyed, and even tried to turn into a video for my film & drama class.
I also had to read Sons and Lovers in high school, and some Thomas Hardy at uni, but I'm pretty sure I would've hated those anyway.
no subject
Date: 2008-12-31 01:08 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-12-31 01:12 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-12-31 03:14 am (UTC)Work of near-insane genius, yes.
Ten-ton weight of 'what's the point of being alive, anyway? Whatever you do, life will suck' dropped on the heads of a bunch of tender teenagers? Also yes.
Still bitter about that, actually.
no subject
Date: 2008-12-31 04:03 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-12-31 07:06 am (UTC)And Pterry's "Nation" is crap.
no subject
Date: 2008-12-31 07:35 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-12-31 12:02 pm (UTC)I feel that English lit would even have managed to wreck those, had they been studied in school.
no subject
Date: 2009-01-01 10:53 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-01-01 10:54 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-01-01 10:55 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-01-01 06:51 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-01-01 06:59 pm (UTC)Of course, we are all a bit strange around here anyway :)
no subject
Date: 2009-01-02 12:13 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-01-02 12:21 am (UTC)I like the bits on her records where she doesn't vocalise.
no subject
Date: 2009-01-02 02:22 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-01-02 10:15 pm (UTC)Now that Eartha Kitt has died, Cleo Laine is my number 1 sex kitten...