Analogy warning
Aug. 2nd, 2006 09:51 am![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
![[livejournal.com profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/external/lj-userinfo.gif)
I was specifically thinking of this balance of basic factors in relation to Pushing Ice by Alastair Reynolds, which I read over last weekend. The thing is, it is a work where the main plot line and the world building are really well done. Like Revelation Space, it is a BDO (Big Dumb* Object) story and the plot revolves around tracking and understanding the object(s) in question. It was well done enough to keep me well absorbed in the action right through the book. The problem is that Reynolds must have felt the need to fill out the book with some character action so he dropped a big blob of interpersonal conflict in there to fill in the gaps without upsetting the primary plot. The thing is, it isn't very good. It is more soap opera than space opera and is just grafted on without being integral to the BDO based action at all. The characters are not at all convincing as real humans. In fact, I would say that the two alien races which make an appearance were more human than the humans.
There is another irritation with this book. Nowhere on the covers does it mention that this is part of a series. But about 100 pages out from the end I got that sinking feeling that means you know that there is not enough space left in the book to wrap things up properly. Sure enough, there was a big climax at the end, but there were a lot of loose ends as well which are clearly there just for the purpose of generating a sequel. With the sequels to Revelation Space, once the action left the BDO, the quality dropped off in a big way.
It all leaves... - well you can figure the obvious pun for yourselves.
* Dumb in the sense of "does not communicate" - Big Dumb Object is a term used for this type of story by The Encyclopedia of Science Fiction by Clute & Nicholls.