threemonkeys: (Default)
[personal profile] threemonkeys
I find the implications of the technology described in this article very disturbing. The development of an effective non-lethal crowd control device would lead to the effective ending of public political protest. This paragraph from the article sums up my misgivings:
The development of a truly safe and highly effective nonlethal crowd-control system could raise enormous ethical questions about the state's use of coercive force. If a method such as ADS leads to no lasting injury or harm, authorities may find easier justifications for employing them.

Date: 2006-12-06 04:16 am (UTC)
ext_112556: (Default)
From: [identity profile] threemonkeys.livejournal.com
So how long will it take for this to be available as hand held technology?

Judging by the pictures of the prototypes, it will be portable from the get-go. It should take as long to go from "official" hands to a wider audience about the same time as tazers took. Actually, in this country people had tazers years before the police had them. Scary huh?

Profile

threemonkeys: (Default)
threemonkeys

June 2015

S M T W T F S
 123456
789 10111213
14 1516171819 20
21222324252627
282930    

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Feb. 26th, 2026 03:42 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios