OK, this just has me perplexed. See I have one of those desk calendars that gives you a trivia question per day. On Friday, it posed the question "Where might you hear people mention the terms penultimate and rover?" The answer given, from a multi-choice set is "On a cricket pitch".
They are valid English words, and I suppose you could fit them into the description of a game but I wouldn't think them distinctively cricket terms in any way. For example penultimate does occasionally get used by commentators in a restricted overs match, but it isn't common. Then perhaps "rover" is just somebody mishearing "over" but I haven't spotted anything else that badly researched. The other questions are very American and rather old which might be a factor (it also makes it a crap calendar generally).
Google does not group the words sensibly, so I'm turning to you. Any ideas?
They are valid English words, and I suppose you could fit them into the description of a game but I wouldn't think them distinctively cricket terms in any way. For example penultimate does occasionally get used by commentators in a restricted overs match, but it isn't common. Then perhaps "rover" is just somebody mishearing "over" but I haven't spotted anything else that badly researched. The other questions are very American and rather old which might be a factor (it also makes it a crap calendar generally).
Google does not group the words sensibly, so I'm turning to you. Any ideas?
no subject
Date: 2009-03-08 01:29 pm (UTC)They've also used:
misunderstoodings
small-ly (opposite of largely)
considerisations
and so on.
no subject
Date: 2009-03-08 07:20 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-03-10 02:23 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-03-10 03:22 am (UTC)Do you have that sort of thing happening, or are you still in the court? Just me being curious y'know.
no subject
Date: 2009-03-10 03:30 am (UTC)We're not in the room any more but in a small cubicle where the monitor can contact the judge's associate if they have to. It's better because you can scratch your nose or anywhere else without the whole court observing.
I'm glad we usually just have one person, one court. You lose a lot of accuracy the other way!
no subject
Date: 2009-03-10 03:54 am (UTC)