Modes of failure
Mar. 21st, 2009 03:57 pm![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png){kind=small}
threemonkeysFailure is not updating here for more than a week.
Failure is a department store having a shirt that I wanted to buy and then not having any of their sales counters staffed. There was one counter in the store with people on it, but they refused to serve me. Turns out they "have nothing to do with" the store - they just sell their own stuff inside it.
Failure is stuff.co.nz thinking that a site revamp is just about visual appeal and customisation and completely forgetting that information accessibility is the heart of a news site. The site has a nice clean look but they used to be the best site for getting news rapidly The information density and navigation meant you were never more than a click away from the story you wanted. Now you have to go hunting through many pages and so they are now just another middle ranging member of the pack.
Failure in 1987 is publishing an anthology called "The Science Fiction Yearbook", subtitled "The Best Short SF of 1987" and then the editor, David S. Garnett selecting the stories from a very narrow style subsection of the genre. The stories are actually a pretty good bunch, but the effect is somewhat spoiled for me by the mismatch between the title and the contents. It could easily have been saved by a mission statement of some sort in the introduction which clarified the selection criteria. For example, David Hartwell does this well in his "Best of" series. I appreciate it when an editor is able to state their intentions in an introduction. Done well it may only take a sentence or two and yet really help with understanding the anthology. Failure is effectively saying "I pick what I like". While probably true, it does nothing at all to justify the narrow focus of something with such a wide ranging title.
Failure is a department store having a shirt that I wanted to buy and then not having any of their sales counters staffed. There was one counter in the store with people on it, but they refused to serve me. Turns out they "have nothing to do with" the store - they just sell their own stuff inside it.
Failure is stuff.co.nz thinking that a site revamp is just about visual appeal and customisation and completely forgetting that information accessibility is the heart of a news site. The site has a nice clean look but they used to be the best site for getting news rapidly The information density and navigation meant you were never more than a click away from the story you wanted. Now you have to go hunting through many pages and so they are now just another middle ranging member of the pack.
Failure in 1987 is publishing an anthology called "The Science Fiction Yearbook", subtitled "The Best Short SF of 1987" and then the editor, David S. Garnett selecting the stories from a very narrow style subsection of the genre. The stories are actually a pretty good bunch, but the effect is somewhat spoiled for me by the mismatch between the title and the contents. It could easily have been saved by a mission statement of some sort in the introduction which clarified the selection criteria. For example, David Hartwell does this well in his "Best of" series. I appreciate it when an editor is able to state their intentions in an introduction. Done well it may only take a sentence or two and yet really help with understanding the anthology. Failure is effectively saying "I pick what I like". While probably true, it does nothing at all to justify the narrow focus of something with such a wide ranging title.
![[identity profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/openid.png){kind=small}
no subject
Date: 2009-03-23 08:48 am (UTC)